logo
LEGISLATIVE NEWS

bar

bulletINDEX bulletABOUT MSNO bullet MSNO REGIONS bulletExecutive Board bullet LINKS bullet EVENTS
bullet Marketplace bullet NOMINATIONS bullet MEMBERSHIP bullet CAREER OPPORTUNITIES bullet MSNO Enews bullet HONORS
bullet GRANTS bullet NEWS ROOM bullet LICENSURE bullet RESOURCES bullet LEGISLATIVE NEWS bullet PAY EQUITY
Bullet PHOTOS bullet RETIRED MEMBERS bullet LIGHTER FARE bulletMSNO OUTLOOK bullet SCHOLARSHIPS bullet GUEST BOOK



Please Click Below


MSNO Members Active in their Community

Legislative Alerts

NASN Call for Action: SCHIP Update Regarding Veto Override Needed (Posted: 10/5/07)
National Call-In Days to Congress: Override President's Veto of SCHIP (Posted: 10/16/07)
NASN Call for Action: Ensure Medicaid Reimbursement for Schools (Posted: 8/20/07)
House Bill 1139: An Act Authorizing Self Monitoring and Self Treatment for Students With Diabetes (Posted: 8-13-07)
House Bill 4199: An Act to Promote Proper School Nutrition (Posted: 8-15-07)
House Bill 2614: An Act Relative to Creditable Service for School Nurses (Posted: 11-15-07)
Senate Bill 1508: An Act Relative to a Retirement Buyback for School Nurses (Posted: 8-24-07)
Calls to advocate for School Health Services Funding with Committee Committee (Posted: May 30, 2008)


MSNO Legislative Priorities 2007
MSNO Policy Report: "Ensuring Access to School Nursing Services for Massachusetts Children and Youth January 2008"
Fact Sheet: Ensuring Access to School Nursing Services for Massachusetts Children and Youth (For Printable copy)

School Health Services Budget 2009 Line Item: 04590-0250
Fact Sheet: "Increase Access to Health Care for Children in FY’09" (For Printable copy)

MSNO Legislative Updates for Annual Meeting 2008

MSNO Legislative Update on Amendment #787
(To Increase Funding for the School Health Services Line Item)

Legislative Visit Day 2008
Legislative Tool Kit

Legislative Thank Yous
    Senate Bill No. 100 (An Act Establishing a Special Commission to Study Essential Health Services in MA. Public Schools)
    Senate Bill No. 101 (An Act Relative to Funding for School Health Programs)


Massachusetts Legislative Tracking Reports (August 8, 2008)


NASN Legislative Priorities for 2007


Legislative Articles in the News

The following are links to some recent newspaper articles and a CNN video clip regarding school health services and funding:
The Republician
"Schools Look at Loss of Nursing Aid" by Ted LaBorde (June 1, 2008)

Worcester Telegram & Gazette News
"School Nurse Funds too Low. 38 Districts Could Lose Out" By Priyanka Dayal (May 13, 2008)

The Daily News Tribune
"City Schools Receive $137K for Health Programs" by Jeff Gilbride (May 13, 2008)

The Daily News
"They Saved His Life! Incredible Coincidences Help Port Teen Restore Man's Heartbeat" by Stephen Tait (May 13, 2008)

CNN VideoClip
"Teen Saves Stranger in Store" CNN VideoClip


The New York Times (August 20, 2007)
"Bush Administration Set New Standards to Restrict SCHIP Expansion"

The Boston Globe
"Children May Lose Out on Insurance New US Rules, State Plan Linked"
By Alice Dembner, Globe Staff (August 22, 2007)




Helpful Legislative Information


School Health Advocacy Day Archives



MSNO Members Active in Their Community
August 13, 2008


Advocacy associated with school nursing has become an important aspect of what we do every day. We have learned to be aware of what is happening in the legislature and also that our voices are heard. We are very fortunate in Massachusetts since we have established our credibility and commanded respect as a profession. When we think of advocacy, legislation and school nursing, several names come to the forefront; one being Representative Jennifer Flanagan, (D, Leominster).

Like most people, Marcia Sharkey and I wear other hats along with being school nurses. We both have been members of the Greater Gardner Relay for Life planning committee. When it came to our attention that we were responsible for planning the Fight Back ceremony this year, including finding a guest speaker, we both looked at each other across the room, and mouthed the words, “Jen?” After that meeting we both talked and agreed that advocacy represents “Fighting Back” against cancer. I asked Jen Flanagan and of course she agreed to speak. Jen’s message was clear and simple; raise your voices and talk to your legislators, asking them to support bills sponsored by American Cancer Society and that promote health and wellness for all. Representative Flanagan shared her pledge to Fight Back: “I pledge to Fight Back by returning to the legislature and supporting the passage of these bills, sponsored by ACS.”(There were several bills pending)

When I saw Marcia, also a cancer survivor and our Relay Ambassador, and Representative Jen Flanagan, carrying the Fight Back banner leading the lap around the track, I knew we made the right choice in asking Jen to be our guest speaker. Representative Jennifer Flanagan is a friend of nursing, health care, children and also the Relay for Life. No matter what Jen’s next endeavor is, as state senator or some other role, we thank Representative Jennifer Flanagan for her continued support and wish her well.

Respectfully submitted,
Susan B. Avallone, RN, BSN, NCSN
61 Carlson Lane
Gardner, MA 01440




Action Alert: S. 2455,"Relative to Providing Equitable Benefits
for Members of the Teachers' Retirement System"

Mimi Stamer, MSNO President Elect
August 10, 2008


Senator Panagiotakos, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Ways and Means, and staff, are reviewing S. 2455 and making a decision in the next two weeks about the bill's movement. It is time for grass roots action by MSNO members now. Please copy, personalize, and send the following sample letter to Chairman Panagiotakos to urge a favorable release of S. 2455, “Relative to providing equitable benefits for members of the teachers' retirement system”.

SAMPLE LETTER (Please personalize yourself, print and mail.)

August, 2008
The Honorable Steven C. Panagiotakos
Chair, Senate Committee on Ways & Means
State House, Room 212
Boston , Massachusetts 02133

Dear Mr. Chairman:

I am writing to urge a favorable release of S. 2455, “Relative to providing equitable benefits for members of the teachers' retirement system”. School nurses became eligible members of the Massachusetts Teachers’ Retirement System (MTRS) after education reform in 1993. As a result, a handful of school nurses who have served our children for many years and are close to retirement have been unable to include their years of employment prior to 1993, for purposes of eligibility in Retirement Plus. As a member of the Massachusetts School Nurse Organization, I am respectfully requesting your support of this bill because it would eliminate this harmful and unintended outcome of education reform for some of our members.

Sincerely,
NAME & CREDENTIALS
ADDRESS
PHONE



Action Alert: Calls to Advocate for School Health
Services Funding with Conference Committee

Mimi Stamer, MSNO President Elect
and Legislative Liasion
May 30, 2008


Please call your respective State Representative and State Senator today May 30th thru Friday June 6th, with the following message:
    "Please ask the conference committee to adopt the House FY09 budget recommendation for school nursing and school based health centers at line item 4590-0250."
The names and phone numbers of your legislators are available at www.mass.gov/legis/city_town.htm

Update: MSNO will be directly contacting members of the Conference Committee, and advocating for funding for school nursing and school based health centers at the school health services line item 4590-0250, as recommended by the House FY 09 budget. Letters generated by the Mass. School Health Collaborative will be distributed to all members of the House and Senate.

The Conference Committee members are:
    House
    1. Chairman DeLeo
    2. Representative St. Fleur
    3. Representative deMacedo

    Senate
    1. Chairman Panagiotakos
    2. Senator Brewer
    3. Senator Knapik

    Please contact me with any questions or comments. Thank you for your continued outpouring of calls and advocacy!




UPDATE: Amendment #787 (to Increase Funding for
the School Health Services Line Item)
Mimi Stamer, MSNO President Elect and Legislative Liasion
May 23, 2008


The School Health Amendment #787 was successfully retrieved from the "no" pile, in the early phases of yesterday's Senate Debate. The advocacy of many was clearly recognized by many Senators and gave us a reprieve for reconsideration of the amendment. By the end of the evening however, it was clear that the Senate was holding the line on any new spending and the amendment was then withdrawn by Sen. Moore with anticipation of inevitable disapproval of increased funding. The Conference Committee will now move to recognize level funding for school health services: $15,000,000. Sentor Moore and others noted that they will also work to retain the additional + $484,0000 (currently unearmarked) in the House version of the line item. A strategy for continued advocacy with House and Senate Legislators who will be appointed to the Conference Committee will be initiated next week.

The calls of school nurses and supporters did create a buzz... thank you for your efforts....and more to come.


logo

Legislator Visit Day 2008


Bring your Legislators to school – to educate and to advocate for
School Health Services as a top funding priority at the State House


The 2nd annual School Nurse Legislator Visit Days are planned for January 2008. The 2007 Legislator visits brought enlightening and positive feedback from both the legislators and school nurses of the thirty districts who participated in the event. The goal in 2008 is to invite your Legislator to school in January BEFORE they are asked to bring their legislative funding priorities to the Senate President.

A “tool kit” for preparing your legislators is available including an invitation for a school visit to a selected and targeted legislator; a notice/letter to be used with school superintendent, principal or school committee as needed; MSNO School Nurse Data and use of business cards; fact sheet on the MSNO legislative priorities; media alert; press release; recommendations for pictures; and a template for follow up thank you notes to lawmakers and school personnel. Further information is available below or please contact Mimi Stamer at stamer@msno.org if you are interested in participating in the Legislator Visit Day 2008. Support and guidance will be available to you from MSNO, our lobbyists Gloria Craven and Stacey Ober, and your school nurse colleagues.

MSNO Legislative Tool Kit


Invite your legislators to your health office and educate them about the true nature of school nursing that is transforming communities. Show them what school nurses do and why our roles are vital for the health and safety of the school community

  • Share with them the data about your daily student encounters and health conditions
  • Introduce them to your students who rely on nursing services in order to access their education (per parental consent)
  • Let them count the epi pens, the inhalers, and the nebulizer sets, oxygen tanks, the AEDs, the glucometers, and the glucagon kits
  • Advocate for funding for the fy 09 budget line item # 4590-0250 supporting School Health Services
  • Advocate for the school nurse retirement bills, professional status, and pay equity
  • Advocate for a school nurse in every school


Ask your legislators to make school health services a top funding priority!


    Re: Action Alert H 2647- MSNO's Retirement Bill
(Now Senate Bill 2455)


From: Mimi Stamer, President-Elect, MSNO
Re: With great appreciation for the advocacy by MSNO's lobbyists' Gloria Craven and Stacey Ober, I am pleased to inform you that the MSNO Retirement bill, formerly HB 2647, has advanced out of committee and become:

SB 2455, An Relative to Providing Equitable Benefits for Members of the Massachusetts Teachers' Retirement System - Sponsored by Joint Public Service Chairmen, Senator Brian Joyce & Representative Jay Kaufman, and Representative Elizabeth A. Malia.

ISSUE: School nurses became eligible members of the Massachusetts Teachers Retirement System (MTRS) after Education Reform in 1993 required Department of Education (DOE) certification. Subsequent legal cases have concurred with this legal analysis. As a consequence of this change, a relatively small percentage of school nurses (less than 300 as estimated by MTRS) who have served our children for many years and are close to retirement have been unable to include their years of employment prior to 1993, for purposes of eligibility in Retirement Plus upon their retirement.

SOLUTION: This bill seeks to remedy this unintended consequence of Education Reform and gross inequity for nurses and certain other school professionals. It allows school nurses, school social workers, early childhood teachers, speech, occupational or physical therapists or school business administrators, who are members of the teachers' retirement system or the State-Boston retirement system to appropriately apply all their years employed in a like position, before Ed Reform, towards the membership requirements of RetirementPlus. Upon their request, the Board may allow the member to elect into the RetirementPlus program. Any active member electing into the RetirementPlus program must make contributions to the retirement system as if they had elected into the program as of July 1, 2001. In addition, the bill requires the member to pay interest on the amounts owed the system from the date of their subsequent election back to July 1, 2001. The interest rate paid by the member will be one half of the actuarially assumed investment rate of return for the applicable retirement system.

For more information contact: Gloria Craven or Stacey Ober at Craven & Ober Policy Strategists, LLC, (617) 523-6501.



MSNO Legislative Updates January 2008


School Health Line Item (4590-0250) for FY ’09 (see attached ESHS fact sheet to be included with tool kit documents on website: Click here)

Advocacy for Essential School Health Services and support for $3.3 million to the School Health Line Item (4590-0250) in FY’ 09 and increase the bottom line appropriation from $16.7 million to $20 million.
    Increase the earmark for “school nurses and school based health centers” from $15 million to $18 million. This would enable 35- 40 additional school districts to be eligible for funding to support school nursing services and additional communities to develop much needed school-based health centers.

    Increase the earmark for “mental health and substance abuse services in school based health centers” from $300,000 to $600,000. This increase would allow nearly twice as many students to access mental health and substance abuse services in school-based health centers.


Massachusetts School Nurse Recognition Week January 28- February 1

Legislator Visit Days
    • Invite legislators to visit you at school during Massachusetts School Nurse Recognition Week.

    • Request that school health services be a top legislative priority!

    • Tool Kit is available by Clicking here (add attached ESHS fact sheet to tool kit documents.)

    - Note map of State with/without current ESHS in tool kit and target legislators to support line item funding for Essential School Health Infrastructure (ESHS) Grant fy ‘09

    - Email Mimi at stamer@msno.org with names of nurses and legislators participating in Visit Day, and with any questions or needs for assistance

MSNO Policy Paper:

Ensuring Access to School Nursing Services for Massachusetts Children and Youth

Join us at the State House for the public release of the MSNO policy paper at a Press Event co-sponsored by Rep. Jen Flanagan in

Celebration of Massachusetts School Nurse Recognition Week
January 29th 3:00 - 3:30 P.M.
Grand Staircase


Recently Advanced Bills Related to School Nurse Retirement and Credible Service:

Frequently Asked Questions:
    • There has been a surge in emails and phone calls regarding the recently advanced bills related to school nurse retirement and credible service. Many nurses are mixing the two bills which is creating further confusion. Please refer questions to Mimi at stamer@msno.org.

    Please note that the bills have not passed into laws yet, and that the legislative process offers no guarantees. If the bills result in laws, then school nurses should consult with the Massachusetts Teachers Retirement Board (MTRB) regarding their individual employment history and their most cost effective retirement options.


Updates and Text of the Bills:

MSNO’s Retirement bill HB 2647 was released by the public service committee unamended to the House Ways & Means Committee. The Senate version of 2455 is the bill that we all negotiated. H. 2647 will just die a natural death and we'll lobby for the Senate version S. 2455 instead which has been sent to the Senate Ways and Means committee for a fiscal analysis.

SB 2455, “An Act Relative to Providing Equitable Benefits for Members of the Teacher’s Retirement System”
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:

SECTION 1. Paragraph (i) of subdivision (4) of section 5 of chapter 32 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2004 Official Edition, is hereby amended by striking out the sixth sentence and inserting the following sentence:

A member of a contributory retirement system other than the teachers’ retirement system or a teacher in the State-Boston retirement system, who transfers into the teachers’ retirement system or transfers into the State-Boston retirement system as a teacher may elect to participate in the alternative superannuation retirement benefit program but that election shall occur within 180 days after establishing membership in the teachers’ retirement system or the State-Boston retirement system.

SECTION 2. Paragraph (ii) of said subdivision (4) of said section 5 of said chapter 32, as so appearing, is hereby amended by striking out the second sentence and inserting in place thereof the following sentence:-

Such member shall have served for not less than 20 years as a teacher in order to be eligible to receive the benefit provided under this subdivision but years of membership service in a contributory retirement system while employed in a public day school in the commonwealth or an education collaborative under section 4E of chapter 40, as a school nurse, school social worker, early childhood teacher, speech, occupational or physical therapist or school business administrator, as determined by the board, shall be considered years as a teacher for the purposes of this section.

SECTION 3. A school nurse, school social worker, early childhood teacher, speech, occupational or physical therapist, or school business administrator, who is a member in service and who on or before July 1, 2001 was eligible to elect to participate in the alternative superannuation retirement benefit program or who transferred from a contributory retirement system to the teachers’ retirement system or the State-Boston retirement system as a teacher under paragraph (i) of subdivision (4) of section 5 of chapter 32 of the General Laws, and who elected not to participate or made no election, may elect to do so within 180 days of the effective date of this act on such form as the state teachers’ retirement board or the State-Boston retirement board shall prescribe; provided that said member shall make retirement contributions to the system, prior to retirement, as if said member had elected into said program on or before July 1, 2001, plus interest. The interest shall be calculated by using one half of the actuarially assumed investment rate of return of the teachers' retirement system or the State-Boston retirement system. The election to participate in the alternative superannuation retirement benefit program shall be irrevocable and shall be subject to said subdivision (4) of section 5 of said chapter 32.

The election provided in this section shall also apply to any retired or other inactive member of the teachers' retirement system or of the State-Boston retirement system who (a) was a member in service on or before July 1, 2001 or transferred from a contributory retirement system to the teachers' retirement system or the State-Boston retirement system after that date, (b) was eligible to elect to participate in the alternative superannuation retirement benefit program, and (c) notified, in writing, the school district payroll, business, or other administrative officer of an intention to elect to participate in the alternative superannuation retirement benefit program established pursuant to paragraph (i) of subdivision (4) of section 5 of chapter 32. The new benefit provided through such election shall be actuarially reduced, if necessary, to meet the plan qualification requirements of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), as provided in paragraph (i) of subdivision (4) of section 5 of Chapter 32.

HB 2614, “An Act Relative to Creditable Service for School Nurses” is in review by House Ways and Means Committee

HB 2614, SECTION 1. Subdivision (1) of section 4 of chapter 32 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2004 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after paragraph (h) the following paragraph:–
(h½) Any school nurse who is a member in service of the teacher’s retirement system or a municipal or city of Boston or state retirement system who is employed in a school approved by the department of education may receive creditable service for any period or periods of work experience in the nursing field. No credit shall be allowed until such member has paid into the annuity savings fund of the system before any retirement allowance becomes effective for such member, in one sum, or in installments, upon such terms and conditions as the board may prescribe, makeup payments of an amount equal to 10 percent of the regular annual compensation of the member when said member entered the retirement system for each year of service so purchased, plus buy back interest. No credit shall be allowed and no payment shall be accepted under this paragraph until the member shall have completed ten or more years of membership service. The maximum creditable service allowable under this paragraph for any member shall not exceed three years. Members in service of a retirement system eligible for said creditable service under this act shall make application for said creditable service within ninety days of being notified by the retirement board of their eligibility after becoming vested in the retirement system or for currently eligible members, within ninety days of the effective date of this act.

Management of Students with Diabetes

HB 1139, “An Act Authorizing Self Monitoring and Self Treatment for Students with Diabetes”

MSNO is meeting with legislators and representatives from MDPH, MNA, the medical community, and ADA regarding HB 1139 to address the two controversial issues within bill:
    1. law authorizing ALL students to self manage diabetes care (removing school nurse approval/assessment/involvement)

    2. authorization of the administration of Glucagon by injection by non-medically licensed school staff, in absence of school nurse



SCHIP Update Regarding Veto Override Needed
Mimi Stamer, APRN, BC
President-Elect, MSNO
October 5, 2007


On October 3, 2007, President Bush vetoed the bi-partisan legislation to extend and improve the Children's Health Insurance Program. Speaker Pelosi has asked all the groups and/or associations that have been part of the Campaign for Children's Health to work towards assuring a veto override on October 18th.

Your assistance is needed to convince certain House Members to change their minds and vote for the veto override. Please spread the word to these Members' constituents. The message is simple: BY VOTING FOR SCHIP, THEY ARE VOTING FOR KIDS!

Access the Veto Document at: www.nasn.org/Portals/0/legislation/2007_10_02_schip_veto.pdf.

Access Helpful Information from Speaker Pelosiâ's office for responding to the arguments in support of the veto; and a List of House Members that are being targeted to change their vote at: www.nasn.org/Portals/0/legislation/2007_10_05_schip_veto_override.pdf,

If you need help in finding out how to reach a Member of Congress, please use the THOMAS Web site at: thomas.loc.gov.



National Call-In Days to Congress: Override President's Veto of SCHIP
Mimi Stamer, APRN, BC
President-Elect, MSNO
October 16, 2007


On Thursday, October 18, the House of Representatives will vote to override the President's veto of SCHIP. In order to overturn a Presidential veto, two-thirds of Congress must vote with us. Although 45 House Republicans voted for the bill, we are still short of the votes in the House required to defeat the President .

A victory for SCHIP is a victory for the health of school children. Please join the efforts of NASN and other children's health advocates for national call-in days to Congress and send the message that children's health is a priority.

Please join us today and tomorrow and let your voice be heard. Call 1-800-828-0498 and ask to speak to your Representative and share the following message:

I strongly urge you to vote to override President Bush's veto of SCHIP.

As a voter, I believe that every child in America needs and deserves health care.

To see how Members of Congress voted, visit: clerk.house.gov/evs/2007/roll938.xml.



Massachusetts School Nurse Organization (MSNO)
Legislative Priorities 2007



State Legislation


#1 MSNO Legislative Priority:

Retirement Bills for School Nurses:
  • H 2647, An Act to Define Further Teacher for Retirement Purposes sponsored by Representative Elizabeth Malia and filed by the Massachusetts School Nurse Organization via the work and advocacy of Craven & Ober, Policy Strategists, LLC, the lobbying team hired by MSNO www.mass.gov/legis/bills/house/185/ht02pdf/ht02647.pdf.

  • S 1524, An Act Relative to the Retirement Options of Certain Educational Personnel, sponsored by Senator Brian Joyce and advocated for by the Massachusetts Teachers Association www.mass.gov/legis/bills/senate/185/st01/st01524.htm


Ongoing Legislative Monitoring and Advocacy

Buy-Back Bills for School Nurses School Health Services in Massachusetts

Healthy School Nutrition

Health Management of Children with Diabetes in School School Nurses’ Eligibility for Professional Teacher Status Tracking Reports of all pertinent legislative bills for MSNO are available at www.msno.org.


Federal Legislation


Collaborate to Support the Legislative Priorities and Advocacy of the National Association of School Nurses (NASN):
  • Improve the school nurse-to-student ratio and help ensure that all students’ health and safety needs are addressed while in the school setting

  • Support the reauthorization of No Child Left Behind (NCLB), the full funding IDEA, and a position for a National School Nurse within the leadership of Department of Education.

  • Ensure funding for school nursing services needed by students by supporting the improvement and reauthorization of SCHIP and Medicaid reimbursement to schools

Tracking Reports of all pertinent legislative bills for NASN are available at www.nasn.org


Action Alert
Hearing by the Joint Committee for Public Service
House Bill 2614 and Senate Bill 1508
September 27, 2007
State House, Boston
(Time and Room to be Announced)


House Bill 2614, An Act Relative to Creditable Service for School Nurses sponsored by Representative Thomas Kennedy on behalf of Fran Johnson. Read full text of the bill at www.mass.gov/legis/bills/house/185/ht02pdf/ht02614.pdf.

Senate Bill 1508, An Act Relative to a Retirement Buyback for School Nurses sponsored by Senator Robert Hedlund by request and petition of Joyce A. Toland. Read full text of the bill at: www.mass.gov/legis/bills/senate/185/st01/st01508.htm .

Act and Advocate before/after September 27th on behalf of your nursing experience and creditable service

  • Plan to present oral testimony telling your story as school nurse with prior work experience as a nurse (please inform me of your plans to testify or with any questions via mls5154@aol.com)


  • Plan to attend the hearing on September 27th and offer support for House Bill 2614 and Senate Bill 1508 by your presence with other school nurses.


  • Submit written testimony via email/fax to the Joint Committee of Public Service* in support of House Bill 2614 and Senate Bill 1508 (and email a copy to me for MSNO via www.mass.gov/legis.

Talking Points to support the Buy-Back Bills House Bill 2614 and Senate Bill 1508

  • What impact will the opportunity to buy-back years of creditable service have on you?


  • Why should prior nursing experience be recognized as creditable service?


  • What types/years of previous nursing experience do you bring to your role as a school nurse (intensive care, emergency room, cardiac, pulmonary, oncology, endocrine etc, mental health, pediatric medical/surgical acute care, community health, and primary pediatrics etc)


  • Why do schools need nurses who bring with them a foundation of experience and a knowledge base and clinical skills to deal to autonomously respond to the vast magnitude of medical, physical, and psychosocial issues

  • Request that the legislators consider the value of all nursing experience as creditable service and support that House Bill 2614 and Senate Bill 1508 be reported favorably out of committee.


Members of the Joint Committee of Public Service:

Senator Downing - Berkshire - 617- 722-1625 - Chairman
Benjamin.Downing@state.ma.us

Senator Augustas - Worcester - 617-722-1485 ( Fax 617-722-1066) Vice Chairman
Edward.Augustus@state.ma.us

Senator Hart - First Suffolk - 617-722-1150
John.Hart@state.ma.us

Senator Joyce - Norfolk, Bristol, Plymouth - 617-722-1643
Brian.A.Joyce@state.ma.us

Senator Candaras - First Hampden and Hampshire - 617-722-1291 (Fax 617-722-1014)
Gale.Candaras@State.MA.US

Senator Knapik - Hampden and Hampshire - 617-722-1415
Michael.Knapik@state.ma.us

Representative Kaufman - Lexington - 617-722-2240 – Chairman
Rep.JayKaufman@hou.state.ma.us

Representative Forry - Boston - 617-722-2430 - Vice Chairman
Rep.LindaDorcenaForry@Hou.State.MA.US

Representative Kafka - Stoughton - 617-722-2305 (Fax - 617 722 2598)
Rep.LouisKafka@hou.state.ma.us

Representative Greene - Billerica - 617-722-2210 (Fax - 617-722-2215)
Rep.WilliamGreene@hou.state.ma.us

Representative Fresolo - Worcester - 617-722-2240 (Fax - 617-722-2774)
Rep.JohnFresolo@hou.state.ma.us

Representative Donelan - Orange - 617-722-2230
Rep.ChristopherDonelan@hou.state.ma.us

Representative Pignatelli - Lenox - 617-722-2582 (Fax- 617-722-2879)
Rep.Smitty@Hou.State.MA.US

Representative Conroy - Wayland - 617-722-2240 (Fax- 617-722-2353)
Rep.ThomasConroy@hou.state.ma.us

Representative McCarthy - E. Bridgewater – 617-722-2130
Rep.AllenMcCarthy@Hou.State.MA.US

Representative Smola - Palmer - 617-722-2240
Rep.ToddSmola@Hou.State.MA.US

Representative Lepper - Attleboro - 617-722-2100 (Fax-617-722-2390)
Rep.JohnLepper@hou.state.ma.us


Action Alert
House Bill 2614: An Act Relative to Creditable Service for School Nurses
November 15, 2007


HB 2614 - An Act Relative to Creditable Service for School Nurses was reported favorably by the Joint Committee on Public Service and is now with the House Ways and Means Committee.

HB 2614, filed by Rep. Tom Kenndy, authorizes and regulates the purchase of creditable service towards retirement by any eligible shcool nurse belonging to the teacher's retirement system, or a municipal of the city of Boston retirement system, for work experience in the nursing field.

Please contact the Chairpersons and Members of the House Ways and Means Committee, as well as your personal legislators, to request their support to push this bill through.

Contact information for House Ways and Means Committee

Robert A. DeLeo of Winthrop - Chair Robert.DeLeo@state.ma.us 617-722-2990

Marie P. St. Fleur of Boston - Vice Chair Rep.MarieSt.Fleur@hou.state.ma.us 617- 722-2380

James E. Vallee of Franklin - Assistant Vice-Chair Rep.JamesVallee@hou.state.ma.us 617- 722-2380

Theodore C. Speliotis of Danvers Rep.TheodoreSpeliotis@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2575

Frank M. Hynes of Marshfield Rep.FrankHynes@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2552

Thomas P. Kennedy of Brockton Rep.ThomasKennedy@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2012

William C. Galvin of Canton Rep.WilliamGalvin@hou.state.ma.us 617- 722-2380

Louis L. Kafka of Stoughton Rep.LouisKafka@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2305

William G. Greene, Jr. of Billerica Rep.WilliamGreene@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2210

John F. Quinn of Dartmouth Rep.JohnQuinn@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2020

Paul Kujawski of Webster Rep.PaulKujawski@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2017

Colleen M. Garry of Dracut Rep.ColleenGarry@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2380

Harold P. Naughton, Jr. of Clinton Rep.HaroldNaughton@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2013

Geraldine Creedon of Brockton Rep.GeraldineCreedon@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2070

Barry R. Finegold of Andover Rep.BarryFinegold@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2676

Alice K. Wolf of Cambridge Rep.AliceWolf@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2400

Elizabeth A. Malia of Boston Rep.LizMalia@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2060

Walter F. Timilty of Milton Rep.WalterTimilty@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2810

David Paul Linsky of Natick Rep.DavidLinsky@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2210

Mark V. Falzone of Saugus Rep.MarkFalzone@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2575

Anne M. Gobi of Spencer Rep.AnneGobi@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2210

Mary E. Grant of Beverly Rep.MaryGrant@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2220

William Lantigua of Lawrence Rep.WilliamLantigua@hou.state.ma.us

Robert M. Koczera of New Bedford Rep.RobertKoczera@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2582

Christopher N. Speranzo of Pittsfield Rep.ChristopherSperanzo@Hou.State.MA.US 617-722-2080

Michael J. Moran of Boston Rep.MichaelMoran@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2460

Viriato Manuel deMacedo of Plymouth Rep.VinnyDemacedo@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2100

Karyn E. Polito of Shrewsbury Rep.KarynPolito@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2230

Lewis G. Evangelidis of Holden Rep.LewisEvangelidis@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2263

Paul J. P. Loscocco of Holliston Rep.PaulLoscocco@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2220

Jeffrey Davis Perry of Sandwich Rep.JeffreyPerry@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2396

Daniel K. Webster of Hanson Rep.DanielWebster@hou.state.ma.us 617-722-2487




Action Alert
House Bill 4199: An Act to Promote Proper School Nutrition
August 15, 2007


On July 31, the Public Health Committee approved the School Nutrition Bill. The bill has been simplified but ensures that only healthy snacks and drinks are sold in schools. Some of the bill’s very specific standards have been replaced with a requirement that the Department of Public Health issue regulations that reflect new standards recommended by the Institute of Medicine in April 2007. The bill now heads to the Health Care Financing Committee with a new number – House Bill 4199.

Your help is needed to pass House Bill 4199:

    • Contact your state legislators and urge them to support House Bill 4199: An Act to Promote Proper School Nutrition.

    • Ask your school board members, PTA, church, or hospital to endorse this bill.

    • Write a letter to your local newspaper in support of this bill.
For more information contact Eric Weltman at Massachusetts Public Health Association (617) 524-6696 Ext. 111 or
EWeltman@MPHAweb.org,

The Problem:

Soda and junk food are feeding an epidemic of obesity and diabetes among our children.
Rates of obesity among children have more than doubled in the past two decades.
Children are over-eating food and drinks high in fat and sugar. One source of this problem is the sale of junk food in schools. The easy availability of candy bars, chips, and soda in school vending machines encourage unhealthy eating habits. (Massachusetts Public Health Association)

A Solution:

Healthy food choices for children in school.

House Bill 4199, An Act to Promote Proper School Nutrition, sponsored by State Representative Peter Koutoujian, is an important part of the solution. Schools should provide only nutritious food options to help children learn good eating habits and reduce the risk of health problems In Massachusetts public schools, it proposes to:
    • Replace sodas with healthier drinks, such as water, low- and non-fat milk, and juice

    • Set healthy standards for fat and sugar in snacks

    • Make fresh fruits and vegetables available in cafeterias



______________________________________________________________________
House Bill 4119
An Act to Promote Proper School Nutrition
Sample Written Testimony in Support of Bill


August 14, 2007

Dear members of the Joint Committee of Health Care Financing,

On behalf of the Massachusetts School Nurse Organization (MSNO), this letter is written in support of H 4199 An Act To Promote Proper School Nutrition, sponsored by State Representative Peter Koutoujian. School nurses are very concerned that the rates of obesity among children have more than doubled in the past two decades. We are responding to the health care needs of an increasing number of overweight or obese children in school, who are experiencing the health risks and complications associated with diabetes, asthma, heart disease, depression and low self-esteem. These health risks and medical conditions impact the children’s ability to learn and grow into healthy adults.

Children learn healthy lifestyle habits during childhood and one of those habits should be healthy eating. Schools have the opportunity to teach and support the development of healthy nutritional habits, by providing only nutritious food options. School nurses recognize that children are over-eating food and drinks high in fat and sugar and are concerned about the available source of soda and junk food in school. The easy availability of junk food including candy bars, chips, and soda in school vending machines enables unhealthy eating habits.

MSNO supports the proposed legislation of H 4199 to offer healthier food choices for children in school. through the initiation of replacing sodas with healthier drinks, such as water, low- and non-fat milk, and juice; establishing healthy standards for fat and sugar in available snacks, and to ensure fresh fruits and vegetables are available in cafeterias

In order to promote a generation of healthy children and prevent the health risks and conditions that are an expected outcome of the current epidemic of childhood obesity and diabetes, please support H 4199, An Act to Promote Proper School Nutrition.

Thank you for your consideration and concern about children’s health needs.

Sincerely,

Maryalice Stamer, APRN, BC, PNP
President- Elect, Massachusetts School Nurse Organization




NASN Call for Action
Ensure Medicaid Reimbursement for Schools
August 20, 2007


ACTION ALERT concerning elimination of reimbursement under Medicaid for school administration and transportation (Proposed Rule 2287)


CMS to Cut Reimbursement for Administrative and Transportation Services!
New Regulation to be Published This Month


NASN’s Director of Government Affairs, Mary Louise Embrey clarified previous instructions to contact Secretary Leavitt to indicate opposition to the elimination of reimbursement under Medicaid for school administration and transportation per the forth coming Proposed Rule 2287 which is scheduled for issuance in the Federal Register on August 30, 2007.

Watch the Federal Register Web site (http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html) and comment within 60 days of its issuance, by the deadline of 5pm E.S. T. Nov. 30th. In commenting, please refer to file code CMS-xxxx-P.

Only written comments may be counted as official public comments (ie. not phone calls) Also, because of staff and resource limitations, they cannot accept comments by facsimile (FAX) transmission.

You may submit comments in one of the following ways (no duplicates, please):
    1. Electronically. You may submit electronic comments on specific issues in this regulation to http://www.cms.hhs.gov/eRulemaking . Click on the link "Submit electronic comments on CMS regulations with an open comment period." (Attachments should be in Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, or Excel; however, we prefer Microsoft Word.)

    2. By regular mail. You may mail written comments (one original and two copies) to the following address ONLY:
      Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
      Department of Health and Human Services,
      Attention: CMS2287P,
      Mail Stop S31422
      7500 Security Boulevard
      Baltimore, MD 21244


    Please allow sufficient time for mailed comments to be received before the close of the comment period (Nov. 30)

    3. By express or overnight mail. You may send written comments (one original and two copies) to the following address ONLY:
      Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,
      Department of Health and Human Services,
      Attention: CMS2287P,
      Mail Stop S31422
      7500 Security Boulevard
      Baltimore, MD 21244



Action Alert
Protect Your Practice and MA School Children
MSNO and MNA
August 13, 2007


HB1139, An Act Authorizing Self Monitoring and Self Treatment for Students with Diabetes, is currently before the Joint Committee on Health Care Financing. (To learn more, please read MSNO's 3-07 Legislative Alert by clicking here.) Advocates for HB 1139, An Act Authorizing Self Monitoring and Self Treatment for Students with Diabetes have contacted superintendents in cities and towns to urge them to support this legislation.

HB 1139 would put children at risk and compromise nurses' scope of practice. The bill would allow families to determine how diabetes is managed in school without input from the school nurse, and allow non-medical employees in a school to make assessment decisions about sick children and to administer emergency medication (glucagon).

Action Please do it today!



Points to emphasize:
    * Diabetes is a serious condition and complications require intervention from a licensed professional.

    * Administering glucagon is a complicated procedure, as is assessing a student who is unconscious or seizing.

    * Current regulations encourage collaboration between parents and the school. HB1139 would eliminate this collaboration.
Urge Your Legislators to Oppose HB1139
Allowing people with no medical training to perform medical assessments and administer emergency medication puts our children at risk and compromises nurses' scope of practice!

Contact your legislator today!



Action Alert
Call Your Legislators about House Bill 1139
Regarding Students with Diabetes
Marie DeSisto, MSNO President
March 13, 2007


Dear School Nurse Colleagues,

Representative Kafka (Stoughton) and Senator Moore have filed bills on behalf of the American Diabetes Association that would remove the care of students with diabetes away from the school nurse. It would also require teachers or staff to administer glucagon in an emergency. You can find the bill by going to this link:
(At the bottom of the page clink on: Current Legislation. Go to Text of House Bills. Search for HB 1139.)

This is a dangerous House Bill, that has been filed by a powerful group. We need to organize and stop this for the health and safety of our students. This cannot be ignored. You cannot expect anyone else to do this. Each school nurse must help. Each nurse needs to get a parent to call. This is critical. If this passes then the Epilepsy group will have a Bill to delegate Diastat, etc. This puts students and school departments at risk, and will gut school nursing in Massachusetts.

HB 1139 will be heard tomorrow by the Health Care Finance Committee; you are not limited to calling or writing tomorrow. But do it as soon as possible.

You can link to the committee members at:


Or if that doesn't work, the committee members are:
Moore of Worcester and Norfolk - Chair
Tolman of Second Suffolk and Middlesex
Jehlen of Second Middlesex
Fargo of Third Middlesex
Spilka
Candaras
Tarr
Walrath
Kulik
Hynes
Koczera
Khan
Linsky
Kane
Kocot
Speranzo
D'Amico
Puppolo
Hargraves
Gifford




Action Alert
Professional Status DOE Advisory
Marie DeSisto,MSN
MSNO President
June 21, 2007


The Department of Education's "Advisory Opinion on School Nurses and Eligibility for Professional Teacher Status" was posted on the DOE website earlier this week. Here is the link to the advisory: www.doe.mass.edu/lawsregs/advisory/061807nurses.html.

This is an important step for Massachusetts school nurses. It took a year for the DOE to act on this legislation, which passed in July 2006. However, now it is officially part of Massachusetts General Law that school nurses have professional status and are Professionals!!! This is another step forward.

This week Kathy Hassey, Ann Farrell and I testified to support HB 430 and SB 349, "An Act to Ensure Adequate School Nursing Services". Luckily many school nurse advocates joined us such as MTA, MFT, MNA, Representative Kahn and the Massachusetts Public Health Association. No other school nurses attended.

______________________________________________________________________

House Bill 430
An Act Ensuring Adequate Nursing Services at Public Schools


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows: SECTION 1. Section 53 of chapter 71 of the General Laws is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:

    Section 53. The School committee shall appoint school physicians; nurse practitioners and registered nurses with the DOE licensure, shall assign them to the public schools within its jurisdiction, shall provide them with all the proper facilities for the performance of their duties, and shall assign one or more physicians or nurse practitioners operating under the direction of the physician to the examination of children who apply for health certificates required by section eighty-seven of chapter one hundred forty-nine, but in cities where the medical inspection hereinafter prescribed is substantially provided by the board of health, said board shall appoint and assign the school physicians; nurse practitioners and registered nurses with DOE school nurse licensure, provided however that school districts must meet minimum staffing requirements of school physicians; nurse practitioners and registered nurses with DOE school nurse licensure established by the Department of Public Health and that each school with five hundred or more students shall be assigned at minimum one full-time physician, nurse practitioner or registered nurse with DOE school nurse licensure.


Senate Bill No. 1508
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
AN ACT RELATIVE TO A RETIREMENT BUY-BACK FOR SCHOOL NURSES


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:
    SECTION 1. Subdivision (1) of section 4 of chapter 32 of the General Laws, as appearing in the 2000 Official Edition, is hereby amended by inserting after paragraph (i) the following Paragraph:
    Any member who is employed as a public school nurse and who has previously been employed as a private nurse may establish such private service as creditable service, for a period not to exceed 3 years, by depositing in the annuity savings fund of the system of which he/she is a member the amount which would have been withheld as regular deductions from his salary for such service, plus regular interest to the date of such deposit.



Articles in the News related to ESHS funding and the role of school nursing and school health services.


MassLive
"Bush Administration Set New Standards to Restrict SCHIP Expansion"
Click here

Articles in the News Responding to Proposed Restrictions on SCHIP Expansion


The New York Times (8/20/07)
"Bush Administration Set New Standards to Restrict SCHIP Expansion"

Federal officials have drafted new standards that call for states to demonstrate they have enlisted at least 95% of eligible children that fall below 200% of the federal poverty level before making any changes to enrollment rules for the State Children's Health Insurance Program, according to a letter sent to state health officials. Some state officials said the standards could imperil their efforts to cover more children by imposing standards that could not be met.


The Boston Globe (8/20/07)
"Children May Lose Out on Insurance: New US Rules, State Plan Linked"
by Alice Dembner, Globe Staff (August 22, 2007)

Thousands of Massachusetts children from low-income families could be denied health insurance under new rules imposed by the Bush administration late last week. The rules could cut federal matching funds for a state-run program that is a key component of the state's health insurance initiative.

But congressional leaders, including Senator Edward Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat, said yesterday that they would fight the changes, which are the latest volley in the national battle over the future of the State Children's Health Insurance Program, or SCHIP.

Using a combination of state and federal funds, the program covers some 6.6 million children nationally and 90,500 in Massachusetts in low-income families.

As part of its health insurance reform, Massachusetts expanded eligibility to children in families earning up to 300 percent of the federal poverty level, or $61,950 for a family of four. The change was made last year with federal approval and brought coverage to about 14,000 more Massachusetts children.

In Massachusetts, the program is the main means of insuring children in families above the poverty level who do not qualify for Medicaid and who frequently cannot afford private insurance. The state's health insurance initiative did not include any other effort to cover children.

The new federal rules could block enrollment of more children above 250 percent of the poverty level and could make it tougher for the state to continue covering about 4,500 already enrolled. State officials said they do not yet have a count of the number who are eligible but not enrolled. "We need to do further analysis to determine how these new requirements translate for Massachusetts," Stephanie Anthony, the state's deputy Medicaid director, said in a prepared statement. Healthcare advocates said the requirements would hurt the Massachusetts insurance initiative. "It would result in more kids in Massachusetts going without needed health insurance," said Brian Rosman, research director for Health Care for All. "It would . . . take away one of the essential components of comprehensive reform."

At least 17 other states similarly expanded their coverage in recent years, and five more are considering these changes, according to Families USA, a healthcare advocacy group. But the Bush administration has become concerned about those expansions, and on Friday, the office that oversees the program sent a letter to state officials across the country imposing rules that would make it extremely difficult for most states to enroll new children from families with incomes above 250 percent of the federal poverty level.

Children already enrolled in the program should not be cut off, according to Dennis Smith, the federal official who sent the letter, although Kennedy's staff and Massachusetts advocates suggested it might have that effect. "SCHIP was created for children in low-income families," said Smith, director of the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. "We want to make sure those kids are covered before we go to the higher-income kids."

Smith said the administration is enforcing rules designed to ensure that the program is not substituting for private insurance. But supporters of the coverage expansion said the requirements were an attempt to circumvent congressional plans to extend the program and expand its funding. Both the House and Senate have passed bills to continue the SCHIP program for five years and allow enrollment of children from higher-income families, although Congress recessed for a summer break before resolving differences between the two bills. President Bush has previously threatened to veto the measures.

"Once again, the Bush administration has shown itself to be out of touch and out of step with the priorities of working Americans," Kennedy said yesterday in a prepared statement. "The administration's action denies the promise of good health to thousands of children in communities across America."

The federal government is requiring states to take a number of steps over the next year if they want to continue to cover children at higher incomes, and Anthony said Massachusetts meets only some of these requirements. Under the requirements, children must be without insurance for a year before they can be enrolled, and families of children in the program must pay fees for care similar to those paid by families with private insurance. In addition, the state must show that it has enrolled at least 95 percent of children below 200 percent of poverty and that the number of children insured through private companies has not dropped more than 2 percentage points over five years. The latter requirement is supposed to ensure that employers aren't dropping family coverage.

The new requirements were first reported yesterday by The New York Times. In Massachusetts, a national survey from 2005 showed that 94.4 percent of children below 200 percent of poverty were insured, she said, close to the 95 percent requirement. But the state only imposes a six-month waiting period. She said the state will have to analyze whether its policies comply with the other rules.

Alice Dembner can be reached at Dembner@globe.com.



Legislative Thank Yous

Representative Markey calls on Five Major Food
and Beverage Marketers to Put Junk Food Ads on a Diet

Kathy Hassey BA, BSN, MEd
MSNO President
July 15, 2007


Please call and thank Rep. Markey at 202/226-2424, especially if you are in the MA 7th District. School nutrition is something many school nurses are focusing on.

WASHINGTON : Representative Edward J. Markey (D-MA), Chairman of the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, sent letters to The Coca-Cola Company, General Mills, Kraft Foods, McDonald's and PepsiCo. asking each to voluntarily implement the same restrictions on marketing to children recently announced by the Kellogg Company. Last week, Kellogg agreed to adopt nutrition standards for the foods it markets to children and to place limits on its use of licensed characters and product placements in marketing directed at children.

"While parents and families have an undeniable responsibility to steer their children toward healthy choices, the Institute of Medicine has linked the current unhealthy trend toward poor nutrition and childhood obesity in our country to the prevalence of television advertisements for fast food, junk food, sugared cereals, and other foods wholly lacking in nutritional value. If this trend continues, our children could be the first in generations to enjoy shorter life expectancies than their parents," said Rep. Markey. "These companies are some of the world's largest food and beverage marketers, and together they have the power to play a significant role in solving the childhood obesity problem through socially responsible advertising practices. I urge them to follow Kellogg's lead."

Rep. Markey asked each company to commit to at least the same standards as the Kellogg Company put in place and to outline additional steps that may be warranted to safeguard kids from junk food ads during children's television programming, which have been found to negatively influence children's dietary and nutritional choices. The five companies that received letters are some of the world's largest food and beverage marketers and account for much of children's food and beverage advertising expenditures in the United States.

On Friday, June 22nd, Rep. Markey chaired a hearing entitled "Images Kids See on the Screen," to explore the link between TV advertising and childhood obesity, and to ask whether regulatory or legislative solutions are needed to restrict food marketing on television to combat the serious public health issue of childhood obesity.

Also see www.businessword.com for a great opinion piece on why Congress should curb junk food marketing to kids. It makes it sound like Congress taking action on junk food marketing to kids is inevitable, which is good to have companies read in BusinessWeek!

LINKS to the letters:



Legislative Thank Yous

New Senate Chair of Public Safety Prioritizes School Safety
July 13, 2007


You may want to contact Senator Timility and thank him for prioritizing School Safety as an Issue for the Committee on Public Safety. See his contact information below.

School Safety A Top Issue for New Senate Public Safety Chair

Ensuring school safety and preventing the tragic school shootings that have horrified the nation are top priorities for Sen. James Timilty (D-Walpole), the new co-chairman of the Legislature's Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security. "That's a paramount issue in my district and across the Commonwealth," said Timilty, referencing conversations with police chiefs about being ready to react to school violence and to prevent it. In a brief interview after today's Senate session, Timilty, whose appointment by Senate President Therese Murray was made before the session, said gang violence and homeland security are other top priorities. Timilty opposes the death penalty and legislation allowing policy to pull over and cite motorist for not wearing seat belts.

He succeeds Sen. Jarrett Barrios, who co-chaired the committee before resigning to work as president of the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts Foundation. Timilty joined the Senate in 2004 and most recently chaired the Joint Committee on Municipalities and Regional Government, a committee that will now be co-chaired by Sen. Anthony Petruccelli, who was sworn in today.

Contact:
    The Honorable James E.Timilty
    Senate Chair, Joint Public Safety and Homeland Security Committee
    State House, Room 518, Boston, MA 02133
    Telephone: 617-722-1222
    Email: James.Timilty@state.ma.us



Massachusetts Legislative Tracking Report August 8, 2008

The following legislative tracking reports are provided for your reference. Some are present and past. Each bill also has a line indicating when the bill was heard and its last place of action (where it now resides). A color coding system highlighting certain significant bills will be employed.

By color-coding certain bills, the tracking report gives you:
    The bills that may be important to you and MSNO members
    Notice of pending hearings
    A history of where the bills are moving.


Bills of particular interest with hearings scheduled in the month will be highlighted in yellow. When bills are moving to another step, they will be highlighted as well, typically in aqua/turquoise color. The magenta highlight color is for a MSNO sponsored bill.

So a quick eye-ball review of the report will let you know which bills are up for debate, either in the committee hearing or headed toward a step into the bill making process. This process allows you to get a review without putting your resources of time/expertise in too many spots... kinda like a triage system for your decision making.



Click here for MA. Legislative Tracking Report (August 8, 2008).pdf



Senate Bill No. 100
By Mr. Moore, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 100) of Richard T. Moore for legislation to establish a special commission to study essential health services in Massachusetts public schools. Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities.


The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
In the Year Two Thousand and Seven.
________________________________________

AN ACT ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL COMMISSION TO STUDY ESSENTIAL HEALTH SERVICES IN MASSACHUSETTS PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:

SECTION 1. Notwithstanding any general or special law or regulation to the contrary, there is hereby established a special commission to study health services for students in Massachusetts public and non-public schools, including the current level of school health services, gaps in school health services, the health needs of school children, and the role of schools in addressing health services issues. The commission shall review relevant statistics from the department of education and the department of public health, shall identify the role of school health services in the community, and shall evaluate the impact of school health services on school attendance. The commission shall consist of the house and senate chairs of the joint committee health care, who shall serve as co-chairs of the commission, the house and senate chairs of the joint committee on education, arts, and humanities healthcare or their designees, and three members selected by the governor, including one representative from the department of education and one representative from the department of public health, and one representative member from the Massachusetts School Nurses Organization.

In carrying out its investigation, the commission shall receive testimony from the public and interested organizations, including but not limited to the Massachusetts Association of School Committees, Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents, Massachusetts Charter School Association, Massachusetts Association of Secondary School Principals, Massachusetts Association of Elementary School Principals, the Massachusetts Teachers Association, the Massachusetts Federation of Teachers, the Parents Alliance for Catholic Education, the Massachusetts Nurses Association, the Massachusetts Public Health Association, the Massachusetts School Physicians Executive Committee, The Massachusetts Coalition of School-Based Health Centers, the Federation of Children with Special Needs, the Asthma and Allergy Foundation of New England, and the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation.

The commission shall submit a report and its recommendations, if any, together with any drafts of legislation necessary to carry such recommendations into effect, by filing the same with the clerks of the Senate and the House of Representatives, the joint committee on education, arts and humanities, and the joint committee on healthcare not later than November 24, 2008.



Senate Bill No. 101
By Mr. Moore, a petition (accompanied by bill, Senate, No. 101) of Richard T. Moore for legislation relative to funding for school health programs. Children, Families and Persons with Disabilities.


The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
In the Year Two Thousand and Seven.
________________________________________

AN ACT RELATIVE TO FUNDING FOR SCHOOL HEALTH PROGRAMS

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:

SECTION 1. Section 72 of chapter 44 of General Laws, as amended by section 55 of chapter 127 of the acts of 1999 is hereby further amended by inserting after the following sentence:- “Any funds received by a local government entity pursuant to the provisions of this section shall be considered unrestricted revenue of the local government entity and may be spent in accordance with any general or special law governing the expenditure of the entity’s revenues.”, the following sentence: “provided, however, that a city, town or regional school district shall deposit in a separate account for expenditure by the school committee no less than 75 percent of any such amount; provided, further, that a school committee may make expenditures from said separate account for the enhancement of school health services, including but not limited to school-based health centers and school nursing programs or any lawful health-educational purposes without further appropriation; provided further, that any expenditure from said account on items qualifying as net school spending shall supplement, and not substitute for, the net school spending requirement of the district; and provided, further, that the receipt of such funds shall not affect the calculation of the minimum required local contribution and state school aid as defined in section 2 of chapter 70.

SECTION 2. Section 72 of chapter 44 of the General Laws as most recently appearing in the 2002 Official Edition is herby amended by inserting at the end thereof the following new subsection:- Section 72(a) The division of medical assistance shall promulgate rules and regulations to improve the efficiency of the Massachusetts Municipal Medicaid program in order to maximize the benefits received by state and local communities. Said rules and regulations shall include but shall not be limited to the development of a fee-for-service rate structure and billing methodology, implement oversight procedures to minimize incidents of improper payments, develop in conjunction with the department of education a more effective process for obtaining parental authorization to ensure that every district is maximizing their federal reimbursements under the Massachusetts municipal medicaid program for all eligible special needs students, develop in conjunction with the department of education a Municipal Medicaid section on the department’s website, and improve overall communications with school districts through the DOE.

(b) The division shall take steps to review federal financial participation parameters to ensure that the state program captures all reimbursement opportunities, shall provide updated program materials and manuals and improve overall communications with school district providers and shall implement improved data management procedures to facilitate program monitoring, oversight and review.



SAMPLE LETTERS


Written Testimony
Senate Bill No. 100


On behalf of the Massachusetts School Nurse Organization (MSNO), this testimony is submitted in support of Senate Bill 100, “An Act Establishing a Special Commission to Study Essential Health Services in Massachusetts Public Schools”. As medical science, social economic worlds, and public health issues have evolved, the health needs of children have expanded, directly impacting the scope and delivery of school health services. Public and non- public schools across Massachusetts are educating increasing numbers of students who need the support of a full time school nurse for management of their chronic health conditions, including diabetes, asthma, life threatening allergies. School nurses promote healthy lifestyles, prevent risky behaviors, and respond to public health issues in the school community. School health services respond to the need to overcome barriers to accessing health care for children including poverty, homelessness, underinsurance, and cultural diversity. The commission will provide a comprehensive and current assessment of school health services today with the goal to reach out to all children with a level of services that addresses their diverse health care needs.

MSNO supports the collaboration of the joint committee health care, joint committee on education, arts and humanities, and the appointed representatives from the Department of Education, Department of Public Health, and the Massachusetts School Nurse Organization. MSNO appreciates the opportunity to participate on this proposed commission to study the current School Health Services and contribute to recommendations that will ensure a future for each Massachusetts student for school health services that support their health, development, and safety while they learn.

Please support Senate Bill 100, “An Act Establishing a Special Commission to Study Essential Health Services in Massachusetts Public Schools”. Thank you for your advocacy of school health services and the health care needs of the children of Massachusetts.

Respectfully submitted,

Maryalice Stamer, APRN, BC, PNP
President- Elect, Massachusetts School Nurse Organization


Written Testimony
Senate Bill No. 101



MSNO supports the proposal for a separate account of no less than 75% of the municipal medicaid reimbursement to local government that would ensure the enhancement of school health services that adequately respond to the needs of the students.

Please support Senate Bill 101, “An Act Relative To Funding for School Health Programs ”. Thank you for your advocacy for the funding of essential school health services meeting the health care needs of the children of Massachusetts.

Respectfully submitted,

Maryalice Stamer, APRN, BC, PNP
President- Elect, Massachusetts School Nurse Organization


NASN Legislative Priorities for 2007


Representative Carolyn McCarthy (D-NY-4th) plans to introduce a bill in the first quarter of the First Session of the 110th Congress that would improve the school nurse-to-student ratio. It would create a pilot grant program allowing federal assistance for states most in need of improving their ratio. All students have a right to have their health needs safely met while in the school setting. Current reality is that although students today have greater medical needs than in past generations, caseload assignments for nurses vary greatly throughout the U.S.

NASN is asking members to work with Representative McCarthy’s office on this bill and become an original co-sponsor in support of a critical piece of legislation that will help to ensure that all students’ health needs are addressed.

NASN sees the reauthorization of No Child Left Behind (NCLB) as an opportunity to improve the relationship between school health and the Department of Education (DoED). The law has requirements in IDEA which are not being met due to lack of funding. Fully funding IDEA and including a position for a National School Nurse within the leadership ranks of DoED would help guide the implementation of necessary health services for the increasing number of disabled students and students with chronic health conditions. In addition, the reauthorization of NCLB should ensure inclusion of pupil services personnel as essential members of the school staff. They are a critical link to school success for many students.

School nurses are responsible for assisting students to basic health care services to ensure optimal health, growth, and development in support of their educational success. Therefore, NASN is in support of improvement to Medicaid and SCHIP through the reauthorization process.

For further information, please visit www.nasn.org.



School Health Advocacy Day Archives


Sixth Annual School Health Advocacy Day
Wednesday March 24, 2004
Boston State House
Nurses Hall
8:30 AM to 11:30 AM


School Health Advocacy Day 2004
Tamara Bonaventure of East Boston and
Anthony Delmonaco from Pembroke, speakers at the event.


View More Photos From this Event

"Students Stand up for School Nurses"
By Kay Lazar
Boston Herald
Thursday, March 25, 2004

For East Boston fifth-grader Tamar Bonaventure, losing the school nurse who has been by her side since kindergarten helping her with her sickle cell anemia would be like losing ``a whole part of my life.'' Westford second-grader Christopher Noran, a diabetic, said he relies on his school nurse to test his blood sugar four times a day and give him an insulin injection. The two joined dozens of students, school nurses and parents on Beacon Hill yesterday as they urged state lawmakers to restore $16.1 million for school health services. The governor eliminated funding for the services in his new budget - a move that would force the layoff of hundreds of school nurses and leave thousands of students without critical care, according to the Massachusetts School Nursing Services Collaborative. ``I was so happy to know she was by my side if anything went wrong,'' said Bonaventure, as she stood on tiptoe to speak into the microphone and describe the friendship she formed with her school nurse after being rushed to the hospital in kindergarten. Pembroke fourth-grader Anthony Delmonaco, an asthmatic who learned from his school nurse how to use an inhaler, said he didn't understand why the governor ``wants to spend money on changing the (Cape Cod) rotary, and at the same time take away our school nurses. ``To me,'' he said, ``a school nurse is more important than a rotary.''


School Health Advocacy Day 2004

While the health needs of Massachusetts’ students have grown increasingly complex, many thousands of students receive no, or inadequate, school health services. At the same time, Governor Romney has proposed elimination of the School Health Program in his FY’05 Budget. By discontinuing this successful program, school nurses will be laid off and thousands of children will no longer have access to needed nursing services which, in turn, will impact their ability to attend school.

To help address this problem, school nurses, parents, students and health care advocates converged on the Massachusetts State House on Wednesday, March 24, 2004 from 8:30 A.M. – 11:30 A.M. for a School Health Advocacy Day.

The event, hosted by the School Nurse Services Collaborative, featured a number of speakers including government officials, parents, school administrators and school nurse representatives. All hoped to educate legislators and demonstrate strong support for legislative efforts to reject the governor’s proposals and to reinstate the $12 million in funding that is needed to maintain the standard of care needed to service the growing population of students with mild to severe health needs. Among those speaking at the event was Anthony Delmonaco, a 10-year-old 4th grader from Pembroke, who helped galvanize support for this issue with letters he wrote that were published in both the Boston Globe and Patriot Ledger detailing his fears of losing access to his school nurse, who helps him cope with his asthma.   (CLICK HERE to read Anthony's full speech in support of his school nurse.)

In 1998, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health presented a plan to the House and Senate Ways and Means Committees for the expansion of school health services. In FY 2001 and 2002, the legislature responded by increasing funding for school health services. In 2003, the legislature rejected the governor’s first attempt to eliminate the successful Enhanced School Health program that funds school nurses in cities and towns with children lacking access to adequate health care.

School nurses provide a valuable social and health care safety net, particularly in tough economic times as school nurses are a primary source for poor or uninsured children to have access to health assessment. Also, in the wake of growing concerns over bioterrorism, school nurses provide a readily available resource for early detection and rapid response in local communities to a public health emergency.

As early as 1992, a special commission relative to the practice of school nursing recognized the unmet needs of Massachusetts students and concluded, “Children attending schools in the Commonwealth today are faced not only with the usual and common infectious disease, they face the threat of other major health problems not always well understood by teachers, parents and the community. Special needs children integrated into classrooms of every town have significant health and nursing needs, including such things as catheterization, suctioning and the administration of complex treatments. The administration of medication and the monitoring of their effects, couple with the needs of children from dysfunctional families, further complicates the picture of school health.”

According to Marcia Buckminster, Director of School Health Services for the Framingham Public Schools, the commission report accurately depicts the conditions in her schools, as well as schools throughout the state. “Within the last school year, our nurses have cared for acute, chronic and emergency health problems such as asthma, attention deficit disorder, migraine headaches, epilepsy, heart conditions, diabetes, life threatening allergies, arthritis and hemophilia. We have had students coming to school requiring colostomy care, intravenous medications, nasogastric feeding and other procedures.”

School nurses are also required by law to conduct annual postural, hearing and vision screening tests on all students and monitor compliance with school immunization regulations. They also provide health education to students, teaching healthy lifestyles, as well as management of illnesses.


Archives of Past School Health Advocacy Events

Fifth Annual School Health Advocacy Day
Monday April 28, 2003 ~ Boston State House ~ Boston, MA.


Superintendent of Schools in Medford, MA. Roy Belsen's
School Health Advocacy Day Message
March 24, 2004


Good morning.

I appreciate the opportunity to speak with you today and lend my voice and that of my colleagues in educational administration to the support of essential and quality nursing services in our schools. We should be proud that our commitment to educational opportunity has opened the school door wider than ever before. Today’s schools have very different demographics than those of the past. Our schools are more accessible to medically challenged students and families than ever before. Twenty-five percent of our students come to school today with some form of medical impairment. This number increases in our urban areas. Almost twenty-one percent of children in the United States, between the ages of nine and seventeen, have a diagnosed mental or addictive disorder. (Department of Health and Human Services, 1999) In Massachusetts, twelve percent of our school age children live in poverty and do not have appropriate access to primary care and many lack insurance.

The advances in medical technology have enabled more children with significant health care needs to attend school. Medical procedures that at one time could only be provided in hospital settings are now being performed in school settings by our school nurses such as catheterizations, tracheostomy care, colostomy care, intravenous infusions, feeding tubes, and insulin pump care to name just a few.

The students who attend our schools today have chronic health conditions that range from the minor to the severe. Today’s school nurse must be prepared to treat allergies, asthma, substance abuse, injuries from domestic violence, sexually transmitted diseases, pregnancies, emotional distress, and conditions resulting from congenital defects. The list is endless.

Added to that are the responsibilities of screenings for the early detection of hearing, vision, and postural defects, and special needs. The school nurse responds to the incidence of communicable diseases such as sexually transmitted diseases, chicken pox, hepatitis, and meningitis. Nurses not only work to prevent the spread of disease, but also to allay community fears. Each day hundreds of medications are administered. And it should be understood that requests for treatment are not made by appointment. The flow of service requests defies even the best schedules and organization.

Why do we do all of these procedures in our schools? Is it to increase jobs and expenditures in our schools? Of course not. We do it because it is an essential component of our commitment to serve all children and youth. We do it to provide equal access to education and provide the support necessary to achieve a positive outcome.

We have set some very challenging academic goals for our schools, Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS); No Child Left Behind (NCLB), with high standards of academic excellence and proficiency for all. Educators want to meet those challenges. We are not afraid of accountability, but we want the tools necessary to attain those very challenging goals. Consider the following. NCLB requires that we maintain a 95% attendance rate in our schools. The school nurse helps us to provide the necessary accommodations to keep students in school, in class, and in the least restrictive environment. Absenteeism would soar without the support of school nurses. Can we expect our teachers to cover more rigorous material and at the same time attend to the medical and emotional needs of our most challenged students?

We need to provide the right supports to our classroom teacher. When a student is distressed and distracted for physical and/or emotional reasons, it won’t be extra tutoring that gets him or her back on track. More often it will be a school nurse.

If we are truly concerned with achievement of high standards for all, we will recognize and support the work of our school nurses. Study after study supports the fact that good school health programs are essential to increased academic performance. Desmund O’Byrne in a 2001 study for the World Health Organization wrote, "Good health supports successful learning. Successful learning supports health. Education and health are inseparable."

An U.S. Department of Health report, 1992 stated "Health is a silent partner to education. The health and wellbeing of children are directly related to their academic performance." (Novello, DeGraw, and Kleinman)

The 1989 Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development reported "Students who are hungry, sick, troubled or depressed cannot function well in the classroom no matter how good the school."

There are those who, despite the research evidence from a wide range of sources, believe that schools should not or cannot take on health issues. This position is absurd when we realize that 95% of our children are in school and that there is such a profound link between health and learning.

We should not underestimate the importance of school nurses. They are critical to our ability to address the health and education needs of our students and their families. Nurses are one of our greatest resources for closing the achievement gap between the advantaged and disadvantaged.

To be effective, education must address the "whole child."

In a joint statement on school health former Secretary of Education Richard Reilly and former Secretary of Health and Human Services Donna Shalala said, " America’s children face many compelling education and health development challenges that affect their lives and futures. To help children meet these challenges, education and health must be linked in partnership… school health programs support the education process… integrate services for disadvantaged and disabled children, and improve children’s health prospects."

In the long run, our ability to keep students in school, healthy, and focused will do more for academic achievement than the drill of academic tutoring. I’ll take a school nurse over a tutor any day of the week.

With effective healthcare we can help students learn more, we can reduce discipline problems in our schools and cities, we can produce more productive citizens for our future. Investment in Essential School Health Services should be a "no brainer."

The school nurse plays an important role as a health educator. Most serious illness and early mortality are the results of high health risk behaviors established in childhood. Six of these behaviors can be altered to prevent disease or death, poor eating habits, physical inactivity, tobacco use, drugs and alcohol abuse, accidental or intentional behaviors causing injury, and unprotected sexual activity. Education can help prevent children from engaging in these behaviors. (L. J. Kolbe, 1990, Health Education Epidemiological Surveillance System to monitor youth risk behaviors that most affect health)

C. Everett Koop, former U.S. Surgeon General stated "Health care is vital to all of us some of the time… but public health is vital to all of us all the time." The school is a very important public health setting. We all recognize that the "biggest budget buster" is the cost of Medicaid. We will never get those costs under control by cutting back on front-end health services in our schools. We must promote healthy lifestyles from an early age if we expect to curtail cost for medical services.

The full funding of the Essential School Health Services program in our schools needs to be increased not eliminated. It is a critical component of a successful school.

The fight for sufficient and quality health services and education in our schools is more than a fight for academic excellence. It is our commitment to the whole child, our commitment to a healthy future, and our commitment to a productive economy and to a healthy society.

I would like to thank the legislators who support essential school health services, the Massachusetts School Nurse Organization, Massachusetts Nurses’ Association, and those organizations that have joined this advocacy.



Helpful Legislative Information


New Task Force Report; 2004 - 2005 School Year ESMS Report
Kathy Hassey, MSNO Legislative Liasion
March 13, 2007


It is vital to use data like that below whenever you can show your "Educational" impact on children. When you are speaking with your Administrators or with your Legislators, please feel free to use these numbers from the 04-05 School Year ESHS Report (05-06 Report due out soon...will send when available). These numbers represent the aggregate data from the 102 Essential School Health Services School Districts. It shows the total number of Health office visits (just under 6 million not including screenings, Staff and Faculty visits..keeping them in school, Referrals to PCP's including NEW linkages to PCP's, Emergency Referrals, and Medications Administered). This might be of interest to your Administrators, encouraging them to apply for the new ESHS grant due out next year!

The "Essential School Health Services"
School Nurse Data Report 2004-2005
(102 MA School Districts have the ESHS grant covering ~ 550,000 students, representing half the 1.1 million students in Massachusetts)


School Nurse Student Encounters: 5,930,181* (Just under 6 million)
* 88.5% of students were returned to class after assessment and/or treatment by the School Nurse

Staff/Personnel Encounters (Assessment and/or treatment): 147,624

School Nurse Referrals to Primary Care Providers : 160,980*
*12,253 referrals to new Primary Care Providers (linking students with PCP)

Emergency Referrals: 10,855
17% 911/ambulance services
83.9% Parents transported to emergency services or Primary Care Provider

Medications Doses Administered per month: (Daily and as needed) 93,709 (930,709 annually)

Student Injuries: 40,022
10.1% Intentional (assaults) or (self-inflicted injuries, overdose, suicide attempts)
69.5% Unintentional
20.4% Unknown



WEP Bill Reintroduction


Stay Up-To-Date! The latest GPO/WEP news is posted on NEA's Legislative Action Center at www.nea.org/lac/socsec/index.html. Click on latest news.

Representative Brady to Reintroduce Partial WEP Fix:
Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX) is expected to reintroduce this week his Public Servant Retirement Protection Act, which would provide a partial fix of the Windfall Elimination Provision. Like last year, the bill would change the formula for calculating Social Security benefits for individuals who have income both from covered and non-covered employment.

NEA supported the Brady bill last year as a first step toward full repeal. NEA's goal remains complete elimination of both the GPO and WEP. We will forward more information about the Brady bill following its introduction.

Support for Full Repeal Continues to Grow:
Support for full repeal of the Government Pension Offset and Windfall Elimination Provision continues to grow. The House version of the Social Security Fairness Act (H.R. 147) now boasts 238 bipartisan cosponsors. The Senate version of this legislation (S.619) now has 12 cosponsors. All members of the Massachusetts congressional delegation are cosponsors of these bills.

Action Needed:
Join the tens of thousands of NEA members who have signed NEA's Social Security petition calling for protection of retirement security by opposing Social Security privatization, opposing mandatory coverage for public employees, and support full repeal of the GPO/WEP.

To send a message to Congress and to sign the petition, go to the NEA Web site at www.nea.org/lac/socsec/offsets.html .

Phrases Supporting School Health Services
Marcia Buckminster, MSNO Legislative Liaison
February 5, 2004


The Governor's House 1 budget for 2005 "discontinued" the state funded school health programs. The state senate and house budgets are in the process of being discussed and will be released in the next few months. Now is the time to contact state senators and representatives. Ask that they include funding for school health programs, specifically school nurses, in the '05 budget as they have in past years. A brief personal letter to your elected officials at the State House is a very effective way to communicate the important role school nurses play in the health care of Massachusetts school children.

The following phrases are some examples of talking or writing points that you may wish to use in your own personalized letter. These talking points were written by Mimi Stamer, the school nurse at the Blocks pre-school program in Framingham. Tailor them to fit your situation and share them with colleagues, parents and advocates. Use them also when talking to the press, school personnel and elected officials such as school committee members.

In the year 2005, we will be celebrating 100 years of school nursing in Massachusetts. We have a long history and a reputation country-wide of being one of the finest. Let's all do our part to preserve school health programs for Massachusetts school children



Phrases Supporting School Health Services
Mimi Stamer, RN



Besides heavy backpacks, children carry on their young shoulders, the weight of all the issues impacting their families during these difficult socioeconomic times. School health care responds to their ongoing needs for preventative health care, and management of complex, life threatening medical issues or chronic health conditions. School nurses help keep children healthy, safe, fed, clothed, and sheltered...our "bandaids" extend far, but their effects are often invisible to others.

Students come to school to learn and they visit the health room for bandaids and ice packs. Often behind sad, tired eyes or under thin ragged clothes, we uncover stories about the effects of being cold, hungry, scared, or sick. We know that recurrent headaches and stomach aches, and daily trips to the health room, may reflect a cry for help, a need for attention, a need for a safe spot- from such stresses as academic pressures or the trauma of violence. We see hurt spirits and wounded bodies whose minds struggle to stay awake, to pay attention, and to learn in school, and we know when "something" is not right. We look and listen for visible or sometimes hidden signs of emotional, physical, and sexual abuse. We convene school crisis teams and activate appropriate community agencies to help the child and the family. We always maintain the child’s safety and health as our focus and first priority.

School nurses are often the "life line" to families in crisis, in isolation, in stress. We listen to parents pour out their hearts as they describe their struggles with personal or their child’s physical or mental health issues, unemployment, homelessness, violence, and poverty. Parents share in confidence their struggles, fears, guilt, and needs. We are open, caring, and respectful. We provide parents of all socioeconomic, educational, and cultural backgrounds, ongoing health education, assessment of their child’s symptoms, and referrals for medical or mental health evaluation. We assist them to navigate the complexities of medical, legal, and educational systems. We provide clothing and food from donations, and advocate for adequate shelter and housing. We reach out and hold vulnerable young hearts and adult hands offering hope and strength. They turn to school nurses, because we are here in schools, accessible and willing … to help.

School nurses deliver the essence of health care. We care for the total person, the mind, body and heart. Our knowledge base focuses on the child’s physical, developmental, psychological, emotional, and social well-being. We apply a process of problem identifying, assessing and intervening. We don’t turn our backs or close our eyes. We know that no child lives as an island, so we advocate constantly for the child and family- their rights for education, health care, privacy, respect, and safety. We climb up "hills" and we go out on "limbs", and we often are the voice when they cannot speak, so we speak on their behalf, with confidence and compassion.

School health is the front line for children’s health care. All children have a right to an education and school is where most children come. The school nurse sees and knows what medical care is working, if medications are being given at home, if the child’s symptoms are being appropriately responded to, if the family is following up with the recommended evaluation or treatments. We see children who have not had medical intervention, who have not had educational or developmental evaluation, and whose families need support to navigate expert but complex medical systems. We know "it takes a village to raise a child", and we coordinate the collaboration of a child’s village: home, school, and community. School nurses make numerous phone calls and meet with parents, medical providers, with community agencies, with state insurance, and the interdisciplinary educational team. School nurses know that no medical specialists, no prescriptions, and no educational plans alone, will produce a healthy child, able to access education. Our role is to advocate, educate, and intervene constantly, with the child and family. As school nurses, we have the important challenge and satisfying opportunity, to make a difference in the students’ lives.

The reality of these difficult economic times is that school nurses often provide the only health care for most students who lack health insurance. Federal and State budgetary cuts that have decreased parents’ opportunities for employment, affordable childcare services, job- training programs, and affordable housing, have further impaired the families’ access to health care. State legislative decisions for budget cuts affecting health care and the limitations with insurance coverage from MassHealth and the Children’s Medical Security Plan have resulted in an increased number of underserved families without health insurance.

School nurses examine students with numerous complaints ranging from common sore throats, earaches, headaches, and stomachaches to more unusual rashes, behavioral changes, and potentially contagious diseases. With every encounter we assess students, and we advise parents about health management or recommend further evaluation by a medical provider to diagnose and treat illnesses and injuries. As registered nurses we provide education about fluids, and rest, nutrition and warmth, and routine medical intervention to reduce a fever, or cleanse a wound. As nurse practitioners working in the schools, we expand our roles and expertise, and may provide further diagnostic assessment and treatment via a school based or nurse managed health clinic. But for the child with no school nurse, with no health insurance and no health provider, the emergency room becomes the only source of health care. We know that emergency rooms become filled with families, seeking non-urgent health care, and children must wait long hours instead of being home, resting, and recuperating.

Children in Massachusetts, as nationwide, need timely and effective access to health care that promotes normal growth and development, healthy lifestyles, and that prevents and manages childhood and adolescent illnesses, risky behaviors, and injuries. School Health services support numerous health initiatives and programs that promote preventive health care for uninsured and vulnerable student populations. Nurse practitioners provide primary health care through nurse managed health centers. School health programs address issues concerning early screening for cancer, heart disease and diabetes, child/adolescent mental health, healthy lifestyles, dental health, comprehensive vision screening, adolescent risky behaviors, teen pregnancy and parenting, and the impact of child/adolescent exposure to violence, abuse and neglect.

Registered nurses in the schools are first line health professionals 1) to assess for physical and psychological symptoms manifested from bioterrorism or by the ongoing threat of terrorism, 2) to implement mass screening and immunization programs, and 3) to provide first responder treatment and emergency medical care. School nurses identify and respond to the management of communicable diseases. We have readily available data that supports the Massachusetts Department of Public Health with tracking outbreaks of communicable diseases including varicella, tuberculosis, meningitis, influenza and the list is endless. School health services have implemented the development of Emergency Response Planning Programs in school systems. Cutting funding that support school health services, limits the resources of skilled emergency responders for the entire state, during a time of national health and saf